The proposed Marco Ferrando (Communist Party of Workers ) From the phone book Rosso di Sera "Il Manifesto" on line
The question of left unity that is expressed in millions of workers deserve respect for profondo.Proprio this can not be "used" by the ruling groups of the left as a lever for its own autoassoluzione.Dopo fifteen years a closed loop: the heritage of names, which had gathered in the 90 around the PRC, was first struck by the governments of the center-left and then deprived of any institutional representation at national and European level. The "unity of the Left 'is not no when Giordano, Diliberto, Salvi, Ferrero voted together as one man war missions, gifts to banks, job insecurity. It is not when the same elites had to contend, against each other, the control of respective parties and their institutional survival. It is not no unity when it came to hitting its social base has been lacking when it came to defend their roles. I ask, can now apply for the next rebuild those elites who have destroyed? All the old or new formulas which are now advanced in the name of 'unity' ('federations', 'constituents', etc..) Have a unique common point: the stay at the controls of all those responsible for the defeat. What's more, each formula seems tailored around the role of survival of those who are calling for. In a war of all against all. Without their bilanciodelle responsibility and without any prospect of turning. The CLP is not interested in these geniuses bureaucratic: because there will be no way out of the historical crisis of the left without a radical shift of positions, programs, management teams, without a radical break with the government, national and local level, without recovery a revolutionary program that takes as the only constraint of the general interest of workers, and not that of self-preservation of their class. That is why our party assumes the change in direction of the Italian left's own perspective as a freestanding building. Does this mean that we do not care 'unity'? On the contrary. Are we to challenge the unity of tuttele fight the political left and trade unions. Why not work together with a proposal for unification and radicalization of social struggle, from companies in crisis? Why not fight together in a campaign for the nationalization under workers' control, banks and companies that lay off? Why not work together to promote the area, from North, unitary structures of supervision and working people against the rampant crime and xenophobia rondismo capital daily? We have made these and other proposed unit well before the last election campaign, with repeated calls. But in vain. Maybe that unity of action in the class struggle is less important than its risiko organization? also echoed our proposal of a 'Parliament of workers and left. " If all the left are squeezed out of every parliament, because they do not constitute a public forum for free discussion and unity of action? A 'Parliament of the Left, "as we understand it, would safeguard the autonomy of each component, is based on a free elective representation, strictly proportional representation of various parties of the left, and the active involvement of their people, encourage the promotion of a united front in the movement for real and this should be open to the participation of all representatives of movimento.Questa proposal has a very characteristic simple: it does not protect any advantageous position. The others are left available to get involved in a true comparison, respecting the democracy of their own people?
Other contributions on the prospects of the Italian left on http://www.ilmanifesto.it/archivi/dibattito-sinistra/
