What is the biggest dilemma that divides seo and web designer? Probably if you do not have the same time designers and seo doubts about the answer, as you found you a thousand times in front of the eternal dilemma. We all know that search engines like to have something to index, if possible, page after page, but closely and necessarily html: although they have also started a long time to index flash files there is no comparison. The reading of the flash can be a starter, at best a dessert, but the main course will always be the old, classic HTML page, possibly full text semantically and grammatically corretto.Provare to force the mechanism is difficult, take for example 'experiment done by our mother-site Web Design Genova ... Site
young compared to average for the key sites in SERP Web Design Genova, mostly dating back to 4.5, 6 years ago, has gained in the field, in a few months, a series of lunag backlink important, more or less related to the aspects of the location and web design, climbing slowly the slope: it is now the second most important keys to how web design london, london sites placement, placement london. So what? What's wrong?
Simply, the keys for which you rest well, and minor keys are a little battered by competition and potential users, not particularly full of seo and more or less, provided in advance. Nothing wrong with that, we mean, but not enough to generate a volume sufficiently large amount of traffic.
The reason is simple: as balanced in content, aged in semantics, powerful in terms of bl, the site is (intentionally and forcibly) to Mono-and flash. Point. Too poor a structure for an engine like Google demanding, a bit like trying to make a Formula 1 race with a souped-up point: you can fix your machine when you want and drive as best you can but you will always have an insurmountable handicap.
We consider the experiment in web designg genova failed, therefore, calculating that even in the distance does not check for keys in the SERP as Genoa construction sites and the like? Not quite: we repeat, given the initial conditions of the site did well, she appeared at the top of the SERP of Google for many important keys, super sites far more noble and the elderly. But the impression is that they have reached the limit of the experiment: of course, could be groped new changes, further enhancing the internal optimization, try to select some extra keys, studying new serp ... The problem is that this would not make sense ...
The purpose of the experiment was reached, it was shown that a site with flash all you can come up with a lot of effort and a lot of effort, to pre-established keys and key for some luck, but its cost is too high and the result too thin. How to face Brazil in a game to tighten the ball in his hands a bowl of his grandfather: P
And so, after we obsessed, have debated and discussed, we can not capitulate to the fornt of overwhelming evidence of the facts: we join the chorus and confuse us in the reassuring hum of the mass adding our voice indistinct and unanimous: the board, which at this point can not be trite and trivial that is to decide right away. The positioning is irrelevant or secondary comuqnue? You can also flash around a site, put on display your skills and have fun. You have to face a tough challenge on the engines? Stay with the old html: Insert Flash in strategic areas, play around with the css, but in the many fine meal google html pages. The old engine is hungry and unfortunately for us Web designers will not be enough to feed him some sweet ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment